Legal Opinion
Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dairyland Insurance Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 4, 1985No. Civ. 10846PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
Dairyland Insurance Company [Dairy-land] appeals from a summary judgment entered in a declaratory judgment action in which the district court determined that Dairyland had an obligation of coverage and a duty to defend under an automobile insurance policy issued by it to Garry Hag-strom and that Milbank Mutual Insurance Company [Milbank] did not have an obligation of coverage or duty to defend under a farm owners — ranch owners policy issued by it to Hagstrom. We affirm.
Robert Sabot was allegedly injured in an accident on Hagstrom’s farm near Wilton, North Dakota, on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Norgaard v. Nodak Mutual Insurance CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Mills v. Agrichemical Aviation, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. University of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Sellie v. North Dakota Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Blackburn, Nickels & Smith, Inc. v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Aanenson v. BastienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.