Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Boyle

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The petitioner seeks to modify the provisions in a will made by the testatrix for the distribution of income from two certain testamentary trusts. He is seeking an augmentation of income so that he can pay debts owed by him to others than the estate and meet obligations, which will be possible if a variation of the terms of the trust as prayed for is made. This cannot, however, be allowed. To contravene the will as prayed for would be making a disposition of property contrary to the provisions of the instrument creating the trusts; and would amount to a gift over to him of property of others,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cowie v. StrohmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Upham v. PlankintonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Scott v. QuarlesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Estate of Adams v. VermueleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Trust Under Will of CosgraveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. State Department of Public Welfare v. First National Bank of Chippewa FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Schwager v. SchwagerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  4. First National Bank in Oshkosh v. BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Northwestern National Bank v. BalchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API