Legal Opinion

Scott v. Quarles

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rosenbérry, J.

Some questions are argued with considerable force and at some length which we shall not find it necessary to discuss or decide. The primary question is, Did the trustees have power under the terms of the will creating the trust to enter into a lease of the property which would by its terms not expire for a very long period after the termination of the trust? It was stated upon the oral argument that the trustees were about seventy-three years of age and they would therefore have an expectancy of *330approximately eight years. In the ordinary course of events it is apparent that in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cowie v. StrohmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Scott v. WestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ruggles v. TysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Upham v. PlankintonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hubbell v. HubbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marshall v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Campbell v. KawananakoaHawaii Supreme Court · 1937
  3. In Re Trust Under Will of JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. North v. Augusta Real Estate Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  5. First National Bank in Oshkosh v. BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API