Legal Opinion

State Department of Public Welfare v. First National Bank of Chippewa Falls

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1961PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The department concedes that Samuel C. Wright in his lifetime and his estate thereafter were not liable, apart from the terms of the trust, for Alfred Wright’s support in the county hospital but the department says that the will set up the trust solely to supply Alfred’s comforts and necessities; his maintenance in the hospital is a comfort and a necessity to him; therefore the application of the trust fund to the expense of Alfred’s maintenance there carries out the purpose of the trust.

*379A reading of the trust clauses of the will must convince the reader that the fund is not to be spent for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cowie v. StrohmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Estate of Ogg v. First National Bank of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Marshall v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Estate of TreatWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Boyle v. Marshall & Ilsley BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Auric v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hecker v. Stark County Social Service BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Zeoli v. Commissioner of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Lang v. Com., Dept. of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. State v. HoranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API