Legal Opinion

Keith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 16, 1912No. A-1128PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Parrar L. McCain, Judge. R. E. Keith was convicted of violating'the prohibitory law, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFurman, P. J.

There is no question in this case as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict, and but one proposition is submitted in the brief of counsel for appellant, and that is that the court erred in refusing to allow the appellant, by taking the testimony of two jurors, to show’ the manner in which the jury arrived at its verdict.

It has been repeatedly decided by the unanimous opinions of this court that the affidavits of jurors cannot be received for the purpose of impeaching their verdict.

In the case of Vanderburg v. State, 6 Okla. Cr. 486, 120 Pac. 301, Judge Doyle, speaking for…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Wright v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  2. Giffen v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People v. Lee Yune ChongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Sawyer v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  5. Gaines v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Star v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Weatherly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Payne v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API