Legal Opinion

City of Holdenville v. Deer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 12, 1943No. 30721PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, V. C. J.

This is an action against the city of Holdenville to recover damages for the pollution of a stream. Verdict for defendant was set aside and new trial granted on plaintiff’s motion, and defendant appeals.

According to the record and the briefs, the motion was sustained on the sole ground that plaintiff was prevented from having a fair trial as a result of the alleged irregular or illegal selection of additional jurors to supplement the regular panel for the trial.

The record shows that immediately prior to the trial the regular panel was found to be insufficient, and the court,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dillard v. Star Drilling Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Carson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McGlone v. LandrethSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Every v. EverySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. Salyer v. Central National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Strickland v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API