Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Greenblatt v. Goldin

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 10, 1957PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

94 So.2d 355 (1957)

Morris J. GREENBLATT, and Anna B. Greenblatt, his wife, and Lavinia Waldbaum, a widow, Petitioners,

v.

Richard GOLDIN, d/b/a Metro Tile Co., Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc.

April 10, 1957.

Feibelman & Friedman, Miami, for petitioners.

Leo M. Alpert, Miami, for respondent.

Bucklew & Ramsey, Tampa, Wm. A. McRae, Jr., William O.E. Henry, and Holland, Bevis, McRae & Smith, Bartow, as amici curiae.

On Rehearing Granted.[*]

ROBERTS, Justice.

We are here concerned with Chapter 28243, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1953 — its meaning and its validity. This Act amended Sec.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jones v. Great Southern Fireproof Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  2. Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. N. O. Nelson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Gibbs v. TallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Rio Grande Lumber Co. v. DarkeUtah Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Ruocco v. BrinkerDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1974
  3. Peters v. HalliganNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Broderick v. Overhead Door Co. of Fort Lauderdale, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  5. Ceco Corporation v. GoldbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API