Barrett-Hicks Co. v. Glas
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin-, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action for the foreclosure of certain liens upon the building of the defendants, and this appeal is prosecuted from the judgment rendered and entered against said defendants, and from the order denying them a new trial.
Various phases of this litigation have been before this and the supreme courts on two previous appeals. (See Burnett et al. v. Frank Glas, Jr., et al., 154 Cal. 249, [97 Pac. 423], and also Barrett-Hicks Co. v. Frank Glas, Jr., et al., 9 Cal. App. 491, [99 Pac. 857].)
Counsel for respondent here, in his brief, presents an accurate and well-stated summary of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Lisenby v. NewtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Wagner v. HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Burnett v. GlasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hubbard v. JurianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Wertz v. LambMontana Supreme Court · 1911
- Gallagher v. CampodonicoAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1931
- Harbridge v. Six Points Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Dyer v. MinturnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.