Legal Opinion

Rose v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 26, 2002No. 0361012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FITZPATRICK, Chief Judge.

Harold Oscar Rose, Jr. (appellant) was convicted in a bench trial of unlawfully and feloniously driving a motor vehicle after having been found to be an habitual offender, second or subsequent offense, in violation of Code § 46.2-357. 1 On appeal, he contends the initial order that adjudicated him to be an habitual offender was invalid and that the Commonwealth’s evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for felony habitual offender, second or subsequent offense, because of the infirmities in the original order. We find no error and affirm the trial court.

I.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marable v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  2. Long v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  3. Juares v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  4. Singh v. MooneySupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  5. Speight v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rose v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  2. Wilson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  3. Bishop v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  4. Bishop v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  5. Chris Connors Overcash v. Elizabeth C. Albertella, f/k/a Elizabeth C. OvercashCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API