Rose v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
FITZPATRICK, Chief Judge.
Harold Oscar Rose, Jr. (appellant) was convicted in a bench trial of unlawfully and feloniously driving a motor vehicle after having been found to be an habitual offender, second or subsequent offense, in violation of Code § 46.2-357. 1 On appeal, he contends the initial order that adjudicated him to be an habitual offender was invalid and that the Commonwealth’s evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for felony habitual offender, second or subsequent offense, because of the infirmities in the original order. We find no error and affirm the trial court.
I.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Marable v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Long v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
- Juares v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Singh v. MooneySupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Speight v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rose v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Wilson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Bishop v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- Bishop v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- Chris Connors Overcash v. Elizabeth C. Albertella, f/k/a Elizabeth C. OvercashCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.