Wilson v. Commonwealth

BRAY, Judge.

Sherman L. Wilson (defendant) was convicted in a bench trial for driving after being declared an habitual offender,, a second or subsequent offense, in violation of Code § 46.2-357. On appeal, he contends the Commonwealth failed to prove the requisite prior conviction. We disagree and affirm the trial court.

BACKGROUND

In accordance with well established principles, “ ‘we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’ ” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va.App. 1, 11, 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997)…