Legal Opinion
Singh v. Mooney
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided January 12, 2001No. Record 000636PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lacy
In this case, we determine whether an order entered in violation of Rule 1:13 is void ab initio or merely voidable.
Nathanial Mooney filed a medical malpractice action against Ram Singh, M.D., Sanyogta Singh (collectively “Singh”), Volunteer Healthcare Systems, Inc. d/b/a Dickenson County Medical Center, and Sabry Radawi, M.D., 1 in March of 1995. By order entered October 2, 1998, Mooney was directed to make his expert witness available for deposition by October 20, 1998. The October 2 order also stated that if Mooney did not comply with the order, his action would be “subject to dismissal.”
Moo…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barnes v. American Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
- Rosillo v. WintersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Davis v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- Rook v. RookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Cofer v. CoferSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- MacDougall v. LevickSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- VIRGINIAN-PILOT MEDIA v. Dow Jones & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
- HICKS EX REL. HICKS v. MellisSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- Collins v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.