Legal Opinion

Rose v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 17, 2003No. Record 021324PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Koontz

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the Commonwealth presented sufficient evidence to sustain appellant’s felony conviction for driving after having been adjudicated an habitual offender, second or subsequent offense, in violation of Code § 46.2-357.

BACKGROUND

The pertinent facts are not in dispute. We consider those facts in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, Dowden v. Commonwealth, 260 Va. 459, 461, 536 S.E.2d 437, 438 (2000), and for purposes of our resolution of this appeal, briefly summarize them in the following fashion. On the morning of June 13, 2000, Harold…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dowden v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  2. McMillion v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  3. Reed v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  4. Rose v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brittle v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  2. Schwartz v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  3. Saunders v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  4. Warren Anthony Thomas v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
  5. Com. v. NormanSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API