Legal Opinion
Villa v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 7, 1991No. 90-9CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDEWELT, Judge.
I
In this contract action, plaintiffs, Acacia Villa and 58 other developers of rental *447housing projects, seek back rent payments for housing units rented to low-income families pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f. This action involves the calculation of periodic rent increases due project owners under Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) contracts entered either directly with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or with local authorities who in turn have contracts with HUD. In a June 6,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Janicki Logging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Villa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Adrienne Village v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Zacharin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.