Murray v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Keefe, Judge:
This is an action to recover alleged excess of duties exacted by the collector at New York on a shipment of linseed oil fatty acids from Rotterdam, Holland. Duty was assessed thereon as an unenumerated manufactured article at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiff claims that the merchandise is raw or unmanufactured and therefore dutiable *161at only 10 per centum ad valorem under the same paragraph, or that it is dutiable at the same rate as a waste under paragraph 1555, the latter claim not being stressed.
At the trial, three…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- National Lead Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Balfour Guthrie & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- Protest 63972-K of W. A. Cleary Corp.United States Customs Court · 1947
- Thompson Hayward Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
- Werner G. Smith Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- Wypenn Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.