Legal Opinion

Wypenn Oil Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 28, 1950No. C. D. 1226PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise in question is a byproduct derived from the residue resulting from the removal of free fatty acids from herring oil. The collector assessed duty thereon at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The merchandise imported was crude herring oil, which was placed in a class 6 manufacturing warehouse at the port of Tacoma, Wash., where it was processed by subjecting it to a chemical reaction with caustic soda. The result of such processing was the production of a refined herring oil which was exported. The residue of such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standard Varnish Works v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
  2. Murray v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. United States v. SchrockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API