Legal Opinion

Thompson Hayward Chemical Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 25, 1946No. C. D. 978PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

These are suits against the United States arising at the port of New Orleans by protest against the collector’s classification of pyretoxin No. 18 or pyrethrum extract as a nonenumerated manufactured article, dutiable at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 34 as an advanced drug, at 10 per centum-, under paragraph 35 as-pyrethrum flowers, or at 10 per centum under paragraph 1558 as a nonenumerated unmanufactured article.

Protest was also made against…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  5. United States v. SteverSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thompson Hayward Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API