Legal Opinion

Protest 63972-K of W. A. Cleary Corp.

United States Customs Court

Decided January 15, 1947No. 51524PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Keepe, Judge:

The merchandise invoiced as soybean lecithin, was assessed for duty by the collector as a nonenumerated manufactured article under paragraph 1558, Tariff Act of 1930, at the rate of 20 percent ad valorem. The plaintiff claims that it is unmanufactured and dutiable at 10 percent ad valorem under the same paragraph, or as a waste at 7}i percent under paragraph 1555, as amended by T. D. 49753. By way of amendment of the protest, it is further claimed that it is free of duty under paragraph 1722 as a crude vegetable substance.

The paragraphs of the Tariff Act of 1930, or as such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Togasaki v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. Rice Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  3. Murray v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  4. McLaughlin & Freeman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mutual Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API