Legal Opinion

Town of Loxley v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 7, 1998No. 1961647PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Town of Loxley ("the Town") and Barbara Denham are defendants in an action pending in the Baldwin Circuit Court. We granted them permission, pursuant to Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P., to appeal from the trial court's order rejecting their claims of immunity and denying their motions for a summary judgment. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The plaintiff, Wilmer B. Coleman, is a state prisoner who participated in a work-release program through which he worked for the Town. Denham is an employee of the Town. She was operating a truck, transporting inmates, when Coleman fell from the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. ChisomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Grant v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Hilliard v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Stringer v. Alabama Mineral RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. Alexsis, Inc. v. TerryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte ButtsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte Tuscaloosa CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Hollis v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Ott v. City of MobileDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API