Legal Opinion

Bell v. Chisom

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 16, 1982No. 80-555PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal presents questions concerning the scope of the limited immunity for state employees outlined in DeStafney v.University of Alabama, Ala., 413 So.2d 391 (1982). These questions arise out of a suit by Jesse Bell against seven supervisory co-employees for failure to provide a safe place to work. We reverse the summary judgment in favor of the state employee-defendants and remand for reconsideration in light ofDeStafney, supra, which was decided after the parties' submissions to this court.

Jesse Bell was a laborer with the Alabama State Docks Department (State Docks). In the complaint…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. DeStafney v. University of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. G. D. Searle & Co. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Grantham v. DenkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Gill v. SewellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Duncan v. RudulphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Nance by and Through Nance v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Phillips v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Barnes v. DaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Ex Parte Estate of ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API