Legal Opinion
Ott v. City of Mobile
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided March 28, 2001No. Civ.A. 98-0635-CB-C, 98-0636-CB-CPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BUTLER, Chief Judge.
These consolidated matters are before the Court on the motions for summary judgment filed by the defendant City of Mobile (“the City”). (Knapp Doc. 59; Ott Doc. 56). 1 The parties have filed numerous briefs and evidentiary submissions in support of their respective positions. 2 After careful consideration of these materials and of all other relevant materials in the file, the Court concludes that the City’s motion for summary judgment is due to be granted with respect to Knapp and granted in part and denied in part with respect to Ott.
BA…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Hamilton v. City of JacksonDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
- Borton v. City of DothanDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2010
- Exford v. City of MontgomeryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
- Shehada v. TavssDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Doe v. City of DemopolisDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2011
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.