Legal Opinion

Hollis v. City of Brighton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 9, 2004No. 1012381PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

The plaintiffs Benjamin Hollis and Diana Hollis, husband and wife ("the plaintiffs"), appeal a summary judgment for the defendant City of Brighton ("the City"). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

After a fire destroyed the plaintiffs' house, the plaintiffs sued the City for failing to extinguish the fire and for preventing the plaintiffs from trying to extinguish it. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte ButtsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Hollis v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Ex Parte City of TuskegeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Turner v. Westhampton Court, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Wheeler v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Willow Lake Resi. Asso. v. Juliano, 2081099 (ala.civ.app. 8-27-2010)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API