Williams Constr. Co. v. Standard-Pacific Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
LAZAR, J. pro tem *
This case evolves from a unique and hurried real estate transaction not free from some complexity of concept and ambiguity of execution. Fortunately the beginning awesomeness of the litigation has resolved into manageable questions of slight number. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and appellant challenges the sufficiency of legally admissible evidence to support the findings. No request for special findings was made and all intendments are therefore in favor of upholding the judgment.
On December 21, 1963, defendant Seaeoast Savings & Loan Association…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Hischemoeller v. National Ice & Cold Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Healy v. BrewsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Brichetto v. RaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- George v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Weddington Productions, Inc. v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Shaw v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Podolsky v. First Healthcare Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Chan v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.