Legal Opinion

Healy v. Brewster

California Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1963No. L. A. 26464PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Plaintiffs and cross-defendants (hereinafter referred to as “appellants” 1 ), after trial before a jury, appeal from a judgment in the sum of $61,108.05, plus $16,000 for attorneys’ fees as an item of costs, entered in favor of defendant and cross-complainant (hereinafter referred to as “respondent”) in an action to recover on a construction subcontract.

Facts: August 26, 1958, appellants entered into a contract with the County of Los Angeles for the complete construction of an airstrip at the General William J. Fox Airfield in Lancaster, California.

Part of the required work consisted of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phillips v. G. L. Truman Excavation Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Lavely v. NonemakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. I. & I. Holding Corp. v. GainsburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Richter v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Raedeke v. Gibraltar Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. William O. Walker and Z of San Diego, Ltd., and Cross-Appellees v. Kfc Corporation and Heublein, Inc., and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Hardin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API