Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 1 v. Penn Valley Tile, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM'
Jones, District Judge.
Now pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (MSJ) (Dkt No. 17), including Plaintiffs’ Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (SUMF). Defendants failed to timely respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court issued an Order providing Defendants additional time to respond as is permitted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e)(1). (Dkt No. 18.) Again, Defendants filed no response. As a result, Plaintiffs! Statement of Undisputed Material Facts will be deemed admitted as is permitted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e)(2).
Plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bryan Santini v. Joseph FuentesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Antonio-Murller Genelien v. Verizon Wireless, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- STEELWORKERS PENSION TRUST v. REPUBLIC STEELDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- STEELWORKERS PENSION TRUST v. REPUBLIC STEELDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023