Legal Opinion

Antonio-Murller Genelien v. Verizon Wireless, et al.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 2, 2026No. 3:24-cv-06134Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANTONIO-MURLLER GENELIEN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-6134 (ZNQ) (TJB) v. OPINION VERIZON WIRELESS, et al., Defendants. QURAISHI, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Pro Se Plaintiff Antonio-Murller Genelien’s (“Plaintiff”) application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 1-3.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s IFP application is DENIED, and the Complaint will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff’s Complaint lacks detailed factual…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Melvin P. Deutsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 1 v. Penn Valley Tile, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API