Legal Opinion

State v. Rusher

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 19, 1983PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (York County) convicting him of reckless conduct with the use of a dangerous weapon. 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 211 and 1252(4) (1983). Defendant does not include among his numerous claims of trial error any challenge to the Superior Court’s refusal to grant a mistrial after the jury reported it was unable to agree on a verdict. We conclude, nevertheless, that the court’s instructions to the deadlocked jury are coercive and that the refusal to grant defendant’s motion for mistrial constitutes manifest error requiring the judgment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. CollinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. State v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  4. State v. BahreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. State v. FerrisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BrunetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. State v. BissonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. State v. WeidulSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  4. State v. WentworthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. State v. GantnierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API