Legal Opinion

State v. Bahre

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 23, 1983PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFRESNE, Active Retired Justice.

The defendants appeal from their convictions, following a jury trial in Superior Court, York County, of aggravated assault pursuant to 17-A M.R.S.A. § 208. Each advances several points of error allegedly requiring reversal. Defendant Lax complains that the Superior Court committed prejudicial error by 1) permitting the State in rebuttal to argue a concurrent causation theory to the jury without giving any guidance whatsoever thereon for the jury to use in its deliberations, although requested by the State to do so; 2) inadequately instructing the jury on the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. George Lefkowitz, Joseph P. Dryja, Richard EmondCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  3. State v. CorMontana Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. State v. WrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. CaruoloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  2. State v. PabonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. State v. BoilardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  4. State v. HindsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API