Legal Opinion

Marchetti v. Ramirez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 26, 1996No. 13926PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

The defendants appeal from the trial court’s judgment in this negligence action. They claim that *742the trial court improperly refused to set aside the verdict where (1) the jury awarded damages for future medical expenses in the absence of any evidence that it was “reasonably probable” that such expenses would be incurred, (2) the jury awarded damages for injuries not alleged in the complaint, (3) the plaintiff injected the existence of insurance into the case, so tainting the jury as to require a mistrial to be declared, and (4) the jury made an award that was unsupported by the evidence and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Katsetos v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. State v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Farrell v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Marchetti v. RamirezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Lyons v. NicholsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Musorofiti v. VlcekConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Densberger v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
  5. Vaillancourt v. LatifiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API