Legal Opinion
Los Angeles Transit Lines v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 1953No. Civ. 19602PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.
This application which has been denominated a “petition for a writ of prohibition” relates to an order “pursuant to C.C.P. section 1000” which provides that the court may make such an order on notice, as further provided in section 1010. Said notice must be in writing and “state when and the grounds upon which it will be made.”
The action was for damages for personal injuries by Jack Gill and Bertha Gill v. Los Angeles Transit Lines and G. E. Moore.
The notice of motion provided “that plaintiff will move the court . . . for an order . . . permitting plaintiffs to inspect and copy documents or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Ex Parte ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Kullman, Salz Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Funkenstein v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Flora Crane Service, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- O'BRIEN v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Bunnell v. Superior Court of Alameda Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Pelton Motors, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.