Legal Opinion
Pelton Motors, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 1953No. Civ. 19848PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT (Robert H.), J. pro tem.
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate requiring respondent court to quash a subpoena duces tecum issued by it in case 611606 entitled Gene Tyler, plaintiff, v. Pelton Motors, Inc. et al., defendants. The real party in interest in this proceeding is Gene Tyler, the said plaintiff. He has not filed any opposition to the endeavor of petitioner to have the subpoena duces tecum quashed.
Plaintiff in that case, Gene Tyler, has brought an action against defendant, Pelton Motors, Inc., setting out in his second amended complaint two common counts for alleged salesman’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Union Trust Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Los Angeles Transit Lines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- MacLay Rancho Realty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flora Crane Service, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. PereiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Embassy Realty Associates, Inc. v. Southwest Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. YoungerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. PereiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989