Van Atta v. Schillinger
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shea
Defendant Clair Schillinger appeals from a judgment of the McCone County District Court granting specific performance of an option agreement to plaintiff Leola Van Atta, and ordering the defendant to convey the property involved to the plaintiff.
Defendant raises several issues. He first contends that the writing involved was not an option agreement because it failed to meet the essential requirements for the validity of a contract. In particular, he contends that there was a lack of consent, and that the consideration was legally insufficient. Second, he contends that the tender and demand…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ide v. LeiserMontana Supreme Court · 1890
- Morris v. GoldthorpIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Steen v. RustadMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Raiche v. MorrisonMontana Supreme Court · 1913
- Ratliff v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hetherington v. Ford Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
- Edgar v. HuntMontana Supreme Court · 1985
- Nardi v. SmalleyMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- Pond v. LindellMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Henderson v. Estate of HendersonMontana Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.