Legal Opinion

Edgar v. Hunt

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1985No. 85-127PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

Hunts appeal from an order granting plaintiff Edgar’s motion for summary judgment by the District Court, Third Judicial District, Granite County in this quiet title action. Hunts contend that adequate consideration supported the repurchase option and that the option did not violate either the rule against perpetuities or the rule against restraints on alienation. We reverse and remand for trial.

On August 13, 1964, the Hunts sold the subject real property by warranty deed to Alma and Omer Edgar in joint tenancy. Apparently, the parties entered into a notarized agreement contemporaneously with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Iglehart v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. State v. MurphyMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In Re Murphy's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Keaster v. BozikMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Ross v. PonemonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Urquhart v. TellerMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ski, Ltd. v. Mountainside Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. Towe v. MartinsonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1996
  5. Colby v. ColbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API