Legal Opinion

Pond v. Lindell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1981No. 80-289PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morrison

This suit was commenced by plaintiffs Curtis and Sharon Pond for specific performance of a contract for deed and for damages caused by delay in conveyance. Defendants Dick S. Dye and Patricia L. Dye filed an answer to the complaint. Defendant C. K. Benson answered and filed a counterclaim for attorney fees.

Plaintiffs, the Ponds, filed a motion for partial summary judgment seeking specific performance of the contract for deed and a determination that defendants were liable to plaintiffs for damages occasioned by delay in conveyance. Defendants Dye and Benson filed cross-motions for summary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Myhre v. MyhreMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Thompson v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Van Atta v. SchillingerMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hanlon v. MangerMontana Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baker v. BergerMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McPherson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API