Searles Valley Minerals Operations, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McINTYRE, J.
The California Sales and Use Tax Law (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 6001 et seq.) generally imposes a sales tax on a retailer for the privilege of selling tangible personal property at retail and a comparable tax (known as a use tax) on tangible personal property that is purchased from a retailer outside the state but that is thereafter stored, used or consumed by the purchaser within the state. (Rev. & Tax. Code, §§ 6002, 6051; all further statutory references are to this code except as otherwise noted.) Where, however, a purchaser buys or uses tangible personal property for resale…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Roth Drug, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- In Re Tobacco Cases IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Exelon Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Scott v. JPMorgan Chase BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- MCI Commc'ns Servs., Inc. v. Cal. Dep't of Tax & Fee Admin., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Kreutzer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.