Legal Opinion

Searles Valley Minerals Operations, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 2008No. D049905PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McINTYRE, J.

The California Sales and Use Tax Law (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 6001 et seq.) generally imposes a sales tax on a retailer for the privilege of selling tangible personal property at retail and a comparable tax (known as a use tax) on tangible personal property that is purchased from a retailer outside the state but that is thereafter stored, used or consumed by the purchaser within the state. (Rev. & Tax. Code, §§ 6002, 6051; all further statutory references are to this code except as otherwise noted.) Where, however, a purchaser buys or uses tangible personal property for resale…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Roth Drug, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. In Re Tobacco Cases IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Exelon Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Scott v. JPMorgan Chase BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. MCI Commc'ns Servs., Inc. v. Cal. Dep't of Tax & Fee Admin., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Kreutzer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API