In Re Tobacco Cases II
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
In Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1057 [31 Cal.Rptr.2d 358, 875 P.2d 73] (Mangini), this court held that the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act (FCLAA) (15 U.S.C. § 1331 et seq.), which regulates tobacco advertising, did not preempt a claim against tobacco companies under the state unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) for advertising cigarettes in a manner that encouraged minors to begin smoking. The main issue presented here is whether, as the Court of Appeal concluded, the United States Supreme Court’s later…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Loeffler v. Target CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- People Ex Rel. Harris v. Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.