Legal Opinion
Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. United States (Bruno Scheidt, Inc., Party in Interest)
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 15, 1959No. Customs Appeal 4988PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This appeal arose out of a protest filed by Star-Kist Foods, Inc., an American producer of canned tuna fish packed in oil and of tuna fish packed in distilled water (a “dietetic pack”). The protest was filed pursuant to section 516(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.A. § 1516(b), and attacked the assessment made by the Collector of Cus toms, Port of New York, of an import of tuna fish packed in brine at 12% per centum ad valorem. The Collector assessed the imported merchandise in accordance with paragraph 718(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C.A. § 1001, par.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Carborundum Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- South Puerto Rico Sugar Company Trading Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Mast Industries, Inc. v. ReganUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Belmont Industries, Inc. v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Aimcee Wholesale Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.