Legal Opinion
Belmont Industries, Inc. v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 7, 1975No. 74-1599PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This appeal, after a jury verdict for defendant Bethlehem Steel Corporation in an anti-trust case, raises two principal issues with respect to the conduct of the trial. First, plaintiff, Belmont Industries, claims that the trial judge erred in refusing, upon a motion made after the close of evidence, to strike cross-examination testimony which, although violating both the hearsay and best evidence rules, had been received without objection. The second error, asserts Belmont, is the district court’s foreclosure of evidence concerning Bethlehem’s alleged termination, after…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cornwell Quality Tools Co. v. C. T. S. Company, Inc., Cornwell Quality Tools Co. v. C. T. S. Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. 88 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bireley's Orange BeverageCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by22 opinions
- Daset Mining Corp. v. Industrial Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- United States v. Gibbs, Stephen A/K/A "Jake,"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Motorola, Inc. v. Interdigital Technology Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- The Cromar Company v. Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation and Atlantic Richfield CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Caisson Corporation v. Ingersoll-Rand CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.