Aimcee Wholesale Corp. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BaldwxN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court,1 overruling a protest concerning the rate of duty imposed on certain bicycles imported from England. The bicycles were assessed under paragraph 371 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by Presidential Proclamation 3394:2 Appellants contend that Proclamation 3394, which raised the effective rate of duty from 7% percent to 11 ^4 percent ad valorem, is invalid for reasons which will appear below. The Customs Court upheld the proclamation in a well-reasoned opinion. We affirm the decision and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. United States (Bruno Scheidt, Inc., Party in Interest)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Aimcee Wholesale Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
3Cited by11 opinions
- Florsheim Shoe Company, Div. Of Interco, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Mast Industries, Inc. v. ReganUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Gilda Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Humane Society of the United States v. ClintonUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Florsheim Shoe Co., Div. of Interco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.