Zurich Insurance v. Sunclipse, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PALLMEYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Zurich Insurance Company (“Zurich” or “Insurer”) seeks a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify Defendant Sunclipse, Inc. (“Sunclipse” or “Insured”) for the defense costs incurred and the settlement reached in an unfair competition case filed against Sunclipse by Century Container Corp. (“Century”). In the underlying action, Century sought damages from Sunclipse resulting from the alleged misappropriation of proprietary information concerning the manufacture of conductive surface coating for corrugated boxes.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lexmark International, Inc. v. Transportation InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Solers, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Heritage Mutual Insurance v. Advanced Polymer Technology, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
- Vector Products, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.