May Ex Rel. May v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.
In determining whether a judgment directing verdict for the defendant may be sustained on the grounds of insufficient evidence to show actionable negligence on the part of defendant or because the evidence establishes the plaintiff’s contributory negligence as a matter of law, we are guided by the same principles that prevailed under our former procedure with respect to judgments of nonsuit. See Musgrave v. Savings & Loan Association, 8 N.C. App. 385, 174 S.E. 2d 820. All of the evidence which tends to support plaintiff’s claim must be taken as true and considered in the light most favorable…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Lund Ex Rel. Lund v. KnoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- Childress v. NordmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Musgrave v. Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Cathey Ex Rel. Brown v. De WeeseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Snellings v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Plow v. Bug Man Exterminators, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Miller v. EnzorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Haas v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Fagundes v. Ammons Dev. Grp., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.