Snellings v. Roberts
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Did the court err in entering judgment notwithstanding the verdict pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50? We hold that it did.
In determining the sufficiency of the evidence upon a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, we are guided by the same principles that prevailed under our former procedure with respect to the sufficiency of evidence to withstand a motion for nonsuit under now repealed G.S. 1-183. Musgrave v. Savings & Loan Assoc., 8 N.C. App. 385, 174 S.E. 2d 820 (1970). The same test is to be applied on a motion under Rule 50 (b) (1) for judgment notwithstanding the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Stewart v. Nation-Wide Check CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Maness v. Fowler-Jones Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Musgrave v. Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Dawson v. JennetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Beal v. KH STEPHENSON SUPPLY CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Williams v. OdellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Heist v. HeistCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Allen v. PullenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Izard Ex Rel. Izard v. Hickory City Schools Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.