Legal Opinion

Haas v. Warren

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 16, 1993No. 9210SC992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

The question presented in this case is whether testimony by the defendant attorney and his associate in a legal malpractice action that they did not publish a legal notice in the same newspaper used by other attorneys in their community is sufficient evidence of the standard of care for attorneys in that community. The trial court entered a directed verdict for defendants. We affirm.

On 2 September 1986, plaintiffs sold a tract of land located in Franklin County to Ronnie and Daria LaShannon. The LaShannons signed a promissory note and executed a deed of trust granting the property…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Berman v. RubinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. George v. CatonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Little v. MatthewsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Haas v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance v. Walker & RommDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1994
  4. Little v. MatthewsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Little v. MatthewsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API