Legal Opinion
Rocky Mountain Radar, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1998No. 97-9579PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The ease is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Petitioner Rocky Mountain Radar, Inc. (RMR) appeals the determination of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that the marketing and sale of RMR’s product, a radar jammer, is prohibited by FCC rules interpreting the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. We determine that we have jurisdiction…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- High Country Citizens Alliance v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- At & T Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Farmers Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Connecticut v. SpellingsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- United States v. Garfield CountyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.