Legal Opinion
Connecticut v. Spellings
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 27, 2006No. 3:05CV1330(MRK)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
KRAVITZ, District Judge.
This case arises from a dispute between the State of Connecticut and the U.S. Secretary of Education over each other’s obligations under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub.L. 107-110, codified at 20 U.S.C. §§ 6301-7941 (the “Act”). Although the State and the Secretary have fundamental, important, and bona fide disagreements about the interpretation and implementation of the Act, they are united in affirming its basic goal of seeking to improve the education of our Nation’s children. Indeed, the State expressly disclaims any intent to…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- School District of City of Pontiac v. Secretary of US Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Connecticut v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Burke v. APT FOUNDATIONDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Chau v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- School District v. Secretary of the United States Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.