Farmers Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Members of the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) have petitioned for review of a decision by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which interpreted 47 C.F.R. ■ ■§ 36.154(f) contrary to an interpretation of that same regulation by NECA. We affirm.
I
This case 'concerns the allocation of certain telephone company operating costs between federal and state jurisdictions. The rates charged by each telephone company are generally based on that company’s operating costs. 'Because the FCC regulates rates for interstate telephone service and state utility…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Good Samaritan Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Heimmermann v. First Union Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Kmart Corp. v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Antelope Coal Co./Rio Tinto Energy America v. GoodinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- At&t Communications Systems, a California Corporation v. Pacific Bell, a California Opinion CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. Shupe v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.