Legal Opinion
District of Columbia Retirement Board v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 6, 1987No. Civ. A. 85-3693PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs 1 brought this action against the United States to establish ultimate responsibility for the present unfunded liability of the District of Columbia Pension Plan. Defendant 2 has moved to dismiss this case, contending that this Court lacks jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, plaintiffs’ claims are not ripe for review, and plaintiffs fail to state a claim for relief. In addition, defendant has moved for summary judgment on Count III of the complaint. Oral argument was heard on March 30, 1987. For the reasons stated below, the Court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- William Hohri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Jane Doe v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Megapulse, Inc. v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Lewis v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Rann v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Day v. D.C. Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Curran v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.