Legal Opinion
Rann v. Chao
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 20, 2001No. CIV. A. 99-2349(RMU)PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Alternatively, the defendant moves to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). 1 The plaintiff, Robert Rann (“the plaintiff’ or “Mr. Rann”), brings this suit for damages under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., claiming that his employer, the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”), discriminated against…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Dolcie Lawrence v. Peter Dunbar, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. HohriSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- William Hohri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Rann, Robert W. v. Chao, ElaineCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Schmidt v. United States Capitol Police BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Smith v. ScaliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- National Mining Ass'n v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Nichols v. TruscottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.