Barton v. Ahmanson Developments, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), J.
The underlying action was brought by plaintiff Diane Barton against defendant and respondent Ahmanson Developments, Inc., and others for breach of contract. Appellant Vin A. Fichter, an attorney, formerly represented Barton in the lawsuit. During the time appellant was counsel of record, the trial court imposed a $2,850 sanction against Barton and appellant for discovery abuse. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2023, 2033.) Appellant filed a motion for reconsideration on behalf of himself and Barton. Shortly thereafter, Barton substituted another attorney in place of appellant. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Lund v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Rao v. CampoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Kohan v. CohanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marsh v. Mountain Zephyr, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Diepenbrock v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Rail-Transport Employees Ass'n v. Union Pacific Motor FreightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Downtown Sunnyvale Residential v. Wells Fargo Bank CA6California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Brown CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.