Legal Opinion

Rail-Transport Employees Ass'n v. Union Pacific Motor Freight

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1996No. A070438PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*471Opinion

HANING J.

Plaintiffs Rail-Transport Employees Association (RTEA) et al,2 and their out-of-state attorney Richard E. Schwartz appeal a March 3, 1995, order imposing $29,161.06 in discovery sanctions against them in favor of defendants and respondents Union Pacific Motor Freight (UPMF) et al.3 (Code Civ. Proc.,4 §§ 2023 & 2025), and a February 17, 1995, order denying Schwartz’s application for pro hac vice status.5 Appellants contend the imposition of sanctions was unreasonable and an “unconstitutional penalty,” and that denial of the pro hac vice application constituted an abuse of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Rao v. CampoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Kohan v. CohanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Greene v. AmanteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Schwetz v. MinnerlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Drum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Argaman v. RatanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Tucker v. PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Lindsey v. ContehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Bayati v. Town Square M Properties CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API