Legal Opinion

Harris v. Maryland Casualty Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1931No. 6445PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This is an action on an accident insurance poliey, wherein the beneficiary seeks to recover the amount payable on the death of the insured, alleged to have been caused by sunstroke. The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for the face of the poliey.

The defendant has moved for a new trial, urging: (1) That the death from sunstroke suffered while the insured was playing golf— thus voluntarily subjecting himself to the heat of the sun — was not a death caused by external, violent, and accidental means within the terms of the poliey; (2) that the court erred…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Iowa Life Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Knickerbocker Life Insurance v. PendletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Royal Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Fisher v. Travelers' Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Raley v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of TennesseeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Bukata v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Mutual Life Ins. v. McCullochDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1939
  4. Sykes v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API